Who do you guys think would win in a fight between a Judoka or Tae Kwon Do student?

i dont know who would win i just want some other people's insights. since i am in judo and wing chun i belive that judo would, but my decision is biased so uh yea

Who do you guys think would win in a fight between a Judoka or Tae Kwon Do student?
The one with the highest quality and frequency of training would win.


There are no better arts, only better artists.
Reply:Bren Foster, world aussie tkd champ was bad mouthing judo saying how he could destroy any judoka with his tkd.


Long story short, bren was nearly killed by the 16 year old judoka within a minute in an exhibition match Report It

Reply:Whoever has the most experience has the edge, but assuming everything is equal, I'd probably give the edge to the judoka, but I'm probably biased also since I am a Judoka also.
Reply:Tae Kwon Do by many is considered to be fairly decent art. However, the probelm most encounter with Tae Kwon Do is that students learn a great deal of information too quickly and it does not become a way of thinking but more of "things" that they know. Students in Tae Kwon Do may receive black belts in a couple of years and I have even seen kids as young as 8 %26amp; 9 becoming black belts. That level requires more than just a text book knowledge. In combat or simple competition, reaction is very important and the right reaction matters. If you have to think about the right move, you have probably already thought too long and lost. With Judo and some other arts, advancement usually is slow as each level is not all about just knowing many things but learning how to know things like you know how to blink or move your arm... it just becomes part of you and how you just know the right reaction as you know how to breath.





Another disadvantage of Tae Kwon Do is that it relies to strongly on kicks. There is much more to martial arts than the feet and legs.





And lastly, when talking about street fighting and not in a ring or on the mat, most fights end up on the ground. Tae Kwon Do is not designed for going to the ground. This is where arts like Judo and juditso have a huge advantage.
Reply:This is one of those meaningless questions. It depends on things like luck, stupidity ( for getting into a fight in the first place ) and relative skill levels. For these reasons your question really doesn't have a definitive answer. Also since I carry a dan grade in both TKD and Juijitsu I could really murk this one up couldn't I
Reply:Whichever is the better fighter.
Reply:Judo is a sport, not a fighting style. If the Judoka was sufficiently skilled, he may be able to frustrate his attacker by continually throwing him around until he just gets tired and leaves. I have to admit that I am not trained in Judo, but from what I have read and observed, it seems that Judo lacks any type of 'finishing moves' that Jujuitsu employs such as chokes or joint locks.





I think it would be quite humourous to watch a well trained Judoka or Aikaidoka take on a lesser trained striker.
Reply:Standing up, the Tae Kwon Do student has the advantage. But, if the Judoka gets in close and is able to bring his opponent to the ground, the Judoka would have the advantage with the ability to submit his opponent with a choke or joint lock.
Reply:the winner.does it really matter?

how to grow pomegranate